Responsibilities
The concept of graduated responsibility has been a firm commitment
and characteristic of this educational program from its inception.
This is realized through two parallel approaches, one structural
and the other based upon individual assessment. The structural
considerations include both the personnel on the specific rotations
and the service-specific responsibilities as well as the nature
of the institutions in which they occur. For example, most in-patient
services are staffed by both junior and senior residents. The
junior residents are charged with "running the floor"
under the direct supervision of their senior resident or the attending,
depending upon the nature of the service. Senior residents are
responsible for advanced decision making related to the care of
patients, supervising junior residents in this activity and being
responsible to specific attendings.
In the out-patient setting, most resident clinics at each institution
are staffed by both a junior and senior resident and always by
an attending orthopaedic surgeon. In these clinics, juniors work
directly with senior residents who have the supervisional responsibility
of junior residents and medical students. Both residents ultimately
are under the supervision of attending staff, with the intensity
of supervision reflecting the skill of the residents assigned.
Other subspecialty clinics staffed by full-time faculty usually
require assigned house staff to evaluate new patients prior to
being seen by the attending. Then these patients are presented
along with a differential diagnosis, further work-up strategy,
and outline of treatment alternatives. For follow-up patients,
an assessment of progress and any modification in rehabilitation
programs are provided by residents to attendings.
Increasing responsibility in the operating room reflects the
structure of having a junior, senior and attending all present
for most cases. When the junior resident plays a primary role,
then the senior resident is responsible for assisting in a teaching
capacity. When the senior, by virtue of case complexity, is the
primary surgeon (under the direction of the attending) then the
junior resident is responsible for assisting, understanding the
case, and learning from this experience.
The emergency room provides a very effective structure for increasing
responsibility under appropriate supervision. At Yale-New Haven
Hospital, for example, the typical on-call team includes a PGY-2
assigned to the wards, but expected to accompany the PGY-3 or
PGY-4 to the ER when schedules permit. The PGY-3 or the PGY- 4
is responsible for the ER and reports to and is directly supervised
by the chief resident, who is required to participate in any ER
care requiring an operative procedure and to respond to ER consultations
beyond the experience or comfort level of the junior members of
the team. The assigned attending is always primarily responsible
for the care delivered by any resident in the ER.
In summary , the structure of resident assignments on specific
services and the explicit nature of responsibilities on these
rotations ensure that all residents receive appropriate supervision,
but experience increasing levels of responsibility for patient
care.
The second major mechanism for adjusting responsibility to capabilities
is through the assessment of resident skills by attending and
chief resident physicians. The department maintains a commitment
to provide an environment for individual growth based upon experience
as well as emphasizing maximum safe assumption of responsibilities
at the earliest possible time based upon skill. Resident evaluations
every six months by the faculty insure that residents in need
of enhanced support receive this assistance in a timely fashion
and that those capable are given commensurate and increasing levels
of responsibility.